Does the lack of a uniform framework/system for the development of effective bridge programs present a challenge? How would such a system work in your state?
We've updated LINCS Courses.
Please see the Course Guide for updated information on using the site.
Comments
Hi all,
Below are two frameworks from the Florida Course code. They were designed specifically for students with special needs. The CTE code however, in my opinion, could be used as a model in bridge design for both youth and frankly the general population as well. We are currently using the CTE framework for a baking program. Having an organized framework system allows bridge programs to withstand the rigors of both academics and industry. Ours has allowed us to take a design with specific industry skills to both VR and the community and say here is what the students will learn in language that both groups will understand. When you have adults with a variety of both hard and soft skills, it is imperative to have an organized framework to guide you.
We have developed both a community (professional) support group as well as a unique parent support group. Our community support group has been invaluable in providing materials, curriculum support and instruction, and job placement support. Partnering with VR and industry has been a real win/win for the program.
http://www.fldoe.org/workforce/dwdframe/addl_cte_frames14.asp
http://www.fldoe.org/workforce/dwdframe/ad_frame.asp
Thank you for sharing the Florida's frameworks. What has been developed could indeed become the basis for a more organized model/framework for effective bridge program design. I hope more of the LINC/YAP users will take a look at the websites.